Blog

May 27, 2023

An antioxidation strategy based on ultra

Scientific Reports volume 13,

Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 8455 (2023) Cite this article

1074 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

Antioxidation is in demand in living systems, as the excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) in organisms lead to a variety of diseases. The conventional antioxidation strategies are mostly based on the introduction of exogenous antioxidants. However, antioxidants usually have shortcomings of poor stability, non-sustainability, and potential toxicity. Here, we proposed a novel antioxidation strategy based on ultra-small nanobubbles (NBs), in which the gas–liquid interface was employed to enrich and scavenge ROS. It was found that the ultra-small NBs (~ 10 nm) exhibited a strong inhibition on oxidization of extensive substrates by hydroxyl radicals, while the normal NBs (~ 100 nm) worked only for some substrates. Since the gas–water interface of the ultra-small NBs is non-expendable, its antioxidation would be sustainable and its effect be cumulative, which is different to that using reactive nanobubbles to eliminate free radicals as the gases are consumptive and the reaction is unsustainable. Therefore, our antioxidation strategy based on ultra-small NB would provide a new solution for antioxidation in bioscience as well as other fields such as materials, chemical industry, food industry, etc.

In living systems, antioxidation is one of the most concerned issues since reactive oxygen species (ROS) are usually produced persistently along with normal cellular metabolism1,2. However, excessive ROS often causes oxidative damage to a variety of important cellular components, including lipids, proteins, and DNA molecules3,4,5,6. Currently, various antioxidants have been suggested as dietary supplements to reduce ROS-associated diseases7. The effectiveness of those antioxidants has been proven in the treatments of many oxidative damage-caused acute diseases8,9. However, in recent decades, most clinical trials in the treatments of oxidative damage-caused chronic diseases by the supplements of antioxidants have not provided convincing evidence for the clinical benefits10. Badly, some antioxidants even have toxic side effects11,12,13,14,15, and most of them are non-sustainable in use and become unstable due to their sensitivity to normal environments16,17,18,19,20,21. Therefore, novel antioxidation strategies with high stability, sustainability, and biologically-safety are demanded.

Gas–liquid interface has long been recognized to have unique physical, chemical, and biochemical properties. Recently, it has been employed to regulate many oxidation/reduction reactions. Some simulations and experimental evidence have shown that gas–liquid interfaces could enrich ROS and regulate the processes of their generation and quenching22,23,24,25, resulting in enhancing/inhibiting the substrate oxidation reaction by ROS. For example, Heath and Valsaraj26 studied the process of the enrichment of ROS and the reactants at the gas–liquid interface and found that the reaction rate was largely promoted by several orders as compared with that in bulk solutions. Nam and Richard27,28,29 found that oxidation or reduction would occur at the gas–liquid interfaces of small water droplets for different kinds of substrates. In these studies, the gas–liquid interface takes effect through the adsorption of ROS and/or substrates. Thus, if the surface area of a gas–liquid interface is so small that it prefers to enrich ROS but has insufficient space for larger substances, it may exhibit a certain antioxidant activity for a series of substrates. So far, the size effects of the gas–liquid interface on the reactivity have not been investigated like that of nanodroplets30,31.

Nanobubbles (NBs), typically as a nanoscale gas-phase suspended in the water phase32,33, can provide a large number of gas–liquid interfaces that may be employed for the enrichment of ROS. The size of the NBs varies from ~ 10 nm (ultra-small NBs) to hundreds of nanometers (normal NBs); therefore, it is a suitable model to study the antioxidation or oxidation of a gas–liquid interface. Previously, it has been reported that oxygen NBs promoted the formation of ROS by producing hydroxyl radicals through the collapse of the microbubbles34, while the reductive hydrogen NBs helped the quenching of ROS35,36. However, in these studies, the chemical properties of the gas phases rather than the size of NBs were focused on, in which the gases in the nanobubbles are consumptive and would run out so that the redox reaction is unsustainable.

In this study, an antioxidation strategy based on ultra-small NBs without exogenous antioxidants was provided. A significant size dependence was observed when the NBs were employed to determine their ability to block the oxidization of substances by the hydroxyl radicals. It was found that the ultra-small NBs exhibited a strong antioxidant effect for extensive substrates, while normal NBs worked only for some substrates. Since the gas–water interface of the ultra-small NBs is non-expendable, its antioxidation would be sustainable and its effect be cumulative. We believe that this research would help develop new solutions for removing excess free radicals in a system without reductants supply.

The experiment was first conducted by determining the antioxidant effect of the ultra-small nitrogen (N2) NBs by detecting their ability to block the oxidization of 3, 3′, 5, 5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) caused by the hydroxyl radicals (Figures S1 and S2) generated from H2O2 with the catalysis of Cu2+. Ultra-small N2 NBs were generated in cold pure water (0 °C) during a compression-decompression process37 and then were introduced to the oxidation-reaction system under room temperature and atmospheric pressure. The oxidation curves were obtained by monitoring the absorbance at 652 nm of the oxidized product of TMB38. It's worth noting the N2 NB itself has no detectable absorbance at 652 nm (Figures S3), and the redox potentials of N2 NB-containing water were similar to that of pure water (Table S1). The results showed that the oxidation rates of TMB in water containing ultra-small N2 NBs were greatly reduced in comparison to that in pure water along with the increase of reaction time, and the absorbance values at plateau were much lower than that in pure water (Fig. 1a), which suggests a strong antioxidant effect of the ultra-small N2 NBs. In addition, a comparative study indicated that the antioxidant ability of the ultra-small N2 NBs was equivalent to a common antioxidant, sodium ascorbate, in a concentration between 100 and 200 μM (Fig. 1b).

Antioxidation of ultra-small N2 NBs. (a) Oxidation curves of TMB in water containing the ultra-small N2 NBs. (b) Comparison of the relative oxide value of the ultra-small N2 NBs with the sodium ascorbate with different concentrations. The oxidation curves of TMB in water containing different concentrations of sodium ascorbate were firstly measured like (a). Then the maximum absorption value was obtained from each oxidation curve. The relative oxide value of each item was calculated with: \(Relative oxide\;value\;\left( {item} \right) = \frac{{Max\;absorbance\;\left( {item} \right)}}{{Max\;absorbance\;\left( {without\;NBs} \right)}}\). (c) NB size distribution measured by NTA (upper) and DLS (bottom). Circles highlighted the peak of the NBs with a size of about 50 nm. (d) Oxidation curves of TMB in ultra-small N2 NBs-containing water before and after degassing.

In our experiments, nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) were employed as complementary means to determine the size distribution and concentration of nanobubbles in water39. By monitoring the Brownian Motion of a relatively small number of individual objects, NTA is able to accurately measure the concentration (106–109 particles/mL) and size (10–2000 nm) of polydisperse populations40. Due to the low light scattering of NBs in water, NTA can test their size distribution in the range of 50–2000 nm, meanwhile determining their concentration. In the case of DLS, the collective diffusion of a larger number of objects is monitored and their average size is calculated. However, DLS only provides a rough size distribution of samples ranging from 0.3 nm to 15 μm without concentration information41,42. Figure 1c (upper) showed a typical size distribution of the as-generated N2 NBs as measured by NTA, with the peaks mostly between 50 and 270 nm. NTA analysis also indicated a NB concentration of 5.42 × 107 ± 5.78 × 106 particle/ml and an averaged NB size of 152.7 ± 14.1 nm. Figure 1c (bottom) showed two peaks with very strong scatter intensity in the DLS curves, indicating that the sizes mostly centered at 3.62 nm and 255 nm, respectively. The only peak observed in the DLS number percent curve (Fig. 1c, bottom) centered at 3.62 nm, suggesting that these ultra-small NBs made up the overwhelming majority in numbers in the solution.

A degassing experiment was carried out to rule out the possibility that the introduction of impurities during NB generation might have also caused the observed antioxidant effect. By removing most of the N2 NBs in water after degassing for 24 h under a vacuum of 0.01 atm (Fig. S4), TMB oxidization curves (Fig. 1d) showed that the antioxidation ability of the N2 NBs water was significantly reduced, clearly confirming that the observed antioxidant effect was originated from the N2 NBs rather than from impurities.

Since the size of the N2 NBs generated was widely distributed in the range of 0–300 nm (Fig. 1c), it was plausible to explore if there would have a size dependence for their antioxidant capability. We found that the normal N2 NBs generated in fresh ultrapure water at room temperature did not inhibit but slightly enhance the oxidation of TMB (Fig. 2a). NTA study showed a typical size distribution of the normal N2 NBs between 70 and 220 nm (Fig. 2b, upper), a NB concentration of 6.41 × 107 ± 1.72 × 107 particle/ml, and an averaged NB size of 116.9 ± 14.7 nm. DLS study revealed two strong scattering intensity peaks centered at 142 and 396 nm, respectively (Fig. 2b, bottom). Both NTA and DLS results of normal N2 NBs showed no detectable NBs with sizes smaller than 50 nm, implying that the antioxidant effect was only caused by the ultra-small NBs (typically < 50 nm). Besides, we found that the ultra-small N2 NBs transformed from normal N2 NBs through a freeze-thawing operation also exhibit an antioxidant effect (Fig. S5). In addition to the ultra-small N2 NBs, ultra-small oxygen (O2) NBs also have a strong antioxidant effect in the TMB oxidation reaction (Fig. S6).

Normal N2 NBs-assisted oxidation of TMB. (a) Oxidation curves of TMB in water containing normal N2 NBs. (b) Size distribution curves of normal N2 NBs as measured by NTA (upper) and DLS (bottom).

The above results clearly showed that there was a size dependence on the NB's antioxidant capability. Ultra-small N2 NBs inhibited the oxidization of TMB by hydroxyl radicals, while their clusters or normal N2 NBs (typically > 50 nm) slightly enhance the oxidation of TMB. The contrasting effects of the small and large NBs on the TMB oxidation seemed difficult to be understood. Currently, our knowledge about the chemical properties of the interfaces of NBs is much poor, it is wise to interpret our observations based on the existing realizations regarding the regulation of oxidation and reduction by gas–water interfaces. Since the electrical surface potential difference of NBs is normally − 20 mV, far smaller than the 3 V at the gas–liquid interface of small water droplets28,43. Thus, it is not appropriate to explain our results from the electrical surface field mechanism proposed by Nam and Richard. Previous studies have shown that, when free radicals and substrates were both enriched at the gas–liquid interfaces, the oxidizing reaction could be accelerated26,44. Therefore, we believed that the selective enrichment of ROS at the gas–liquid interface of the NBs might play an important role in our reaction systems. A plausible explanation may be that the surface areas of the ultra-small NBs were so small and had insufficient space for larger substrate molecules to be easily adsorbed, which resulted in the fact that it preferred to enrich more ROS but fewer substrate molecules. The short-lifetime hydroxyl radicals would be enriched at the interface and quenched by themselves (Fig. 3). In contrast, the big surface area of the large NBs (or NB clusters) would enrich both the TMB and the hydroxyl radicals at their gas–liquid interfaces, and enhance the reaction between TMB and hydroxyl radicals as usual. This mechanism also works for another classic hydroxyl radical probe, 2,2'-Azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonate) (ABTS) (Fig. S7). In addition to the hydroxyl radicals, the ultra-small NBs were also found to scavenge superoxide anion radicals (Fig. S8).

The mechanism of antioxidation of the ultra-small NBs.

According to our proposed mechanism (Fig. 3), normal NBs enhance oxidation due to that they simultaneously adsorb ROS and hydrophobic TMB at the gas–liquid interface, which increases their reaction probability. If this is the case, normal NBs should also exhibit antioxidant effects when substrate molecules that tend to remain in the water phase rather than at the gas–liquid interface are used. To test this hypothesis, dimethyl pyridine N-oxide (DMPO), a commonly-used electron spin-resonance (ESR) spin trap, was employed for capturing hydroxyl radicals. DMPO is hydrophilic so that it should present in the water phase. In this experiment, ESR was used to measure the intensity of the oxidized DMPO (DMPO-OH). Results (Fig. 4) showed that DMPO-OH signals in reaction systems containing normal N2 NBs or ultra-small N2 NBs were much lower than that of the control group, indicating an antioxidation effect. The results further support our mechanism.

The DMPO-OH signal intensity in water containing normal N2 NBs or ultra-small N2 NBs over time.

To exclude the possible involvement of the reaction system in the antioxidation of the NBs, we employed ultraviolet (UV) radiation45,46,47 (Figs. 5a and S9) or Fe2+ instead of Cu2+ (Fig. S10) to produce hydroxyl radicals from H2O2. Results also showed a strong antioxidant effect of the ultra-small N2 NBs in contrast to a slight pro-oxidant effect of the normal N2 NBs. Thus, we believe that the antioxidant effect of the reductant-free NBs should be mainly ascribed to the ultra-small NBs themself.

The absorbance of the oxidized TMB by the hydroxyl radicals generated by UV radiation. (a) The absorbance of the oxidized TMB in three parallel groups after UV radiation. (b) The attenuation of the antioxidant capacity of the ultra-small N2 NBs and 1 mM sodium ascorbate after UV radiation for 3 h.

Compared with conventional reducing agents including reactive nanobubbles48,49 that are consumptive in the reaction, the use of ultra-small NBs as an antioxidant has certain advantages. First, the ultra-small NBs are stable in pure water41 and their antioxidant ability could be sustained even under a high-level ROS environment. For example, the ultra-small N2 NBs kept almost 100% of their antioxidant ability (Fig. 5b) in a system containing high-level hydroxyl radicals that were constantly generated by intense UV radiation of H2O2 in water. In contrast, 1 mM sodium ascorbate was consumed gradually and only kept ~ 0.1% of its original antioxidant ability (Fig. 5b) under the same condition. Second, according to the proposed antioxidation mechanism, there would be no harmful oxidized products remaining after quenching ROS with the ultra-small NBs. We believe that this unique property is essentially important in the application of ultra-small NBs as an antioxidant in living systems. The high-dose exogenous antioxidants and oxidation products are often harmful to normal cells14,50. Third, ultra-small NBs are stable and can have a persistent antioxidant function, while many antioxidants are susceptible to the environment and would degrade in storage and transportation. It should be noted that, in principle, the ultra-small NBs are only effective to scavenge short-lifetime ROS but hard to remove long-lifetime free radicals. Fortunately, most of the harmful radicals produced in living organisms are short life-time ROS.

In summary, an antioxidant effect of ultra-small NBs has been explored. Our results indicated that the ultra-small NBs had an obvious effect to inhibit the oxidation of hydrophobic substrates (TMB) or hydrophilic substrates (DMPO) caused by hydroxyl radicals. Since there was no special chemical reducing agents added in the reaction system, the antioxidation ability of the ultra-small NBs could be used safely in living systems and might find its potential applications in relieving oxidative stress in organisms including human beings. In addition, our results may also provide a new scientific view to the controversial issue about the claimed healthy effects of some natural or ‘functional’ water51, since NBs are believed to exist ubiquitously in nature. Further explorations should be conducted in developing techniques to prepare ultra-small NBs with higher concentrations and more precise regulation of the size distributions to fit the antioxidation demands in many practical applications.

Ultrapure water was prepared from an ELGA LabWater (ELGA Classic-PURELAB) instrument. Copper(II) chloride dihydrate (analytical grade, ≥ 99%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd) and 3, 3′, 5, 5′-Tetramethylbenzidine (analytical grade, ≥ 99%, Macklin Reagent); 2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (≥ 98%, OKA); Iron(II) sulfate heptahydrate (analytical grade, ≥ 99%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd); 1,2,3-Trihydroxybenzene (analytical grade, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd); Hydrogen peroxide 30% aqueous solution (in guaranteed grade, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd); 5,5-Dimethyl-1-Pyrrolidine-N-oxide (≥ 98%, SIAL); The purity of nitrogen and oxygen is greater than 99.999%. These chemicals were used as received without further purification.

The NBs were generated by a compression-decompression method in ultrapure water that was previously reported37. The experiment was carried out in a custom-made metal chamber with pressure control. First, ultrapure water was placed into the chamber, and gas (N2 or O2) was introduced into the chamber to a pressure of 0.6 MPa. Then, the pressure in the chamber was slowly reduced (20 sccm) to normal pressure (1 atm). NBs were generated in ultrapure water that was either at room temperature or at 0 °C that was prepared from a mixture of ice and water.

The nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) system (NS300, Malvern, UK) was used to analyze the number density and size of the prepared NBs in water. NTA 3.4 software was used to capture and analyze data. Besides, a dynamic light scattering (DLS, nano-ZS90, Malvern) instrument was also employed to detect the scattering light intensity and number (%) of NBs.

The antioxidant effect of N2 NBs was determined by the ability to block the oxidization of TMB (final concentration of 0.4 mM) by the hydroxyl radicals that were generated from H2O2 (final concentration of 0.8 M) with the catalysis of Cu2+ (10 μM). The effect of NBs on the oxidation kinetics of TMB was determined by monitoring the absorbance at 652 nm. The final reaction volume was set to 1 ml by adding ultrapure/NBs water. After preparing the reaction mixtures, they were immediately transferred to a 96-well plate (each sample of 200 μL in 4 wells). A microplate reader (VERSA max microplate reader) was employed to monitor the optical density change at 652 nm.

Oxidation curve of TMB under normal N2 NBs or ultra-small N2 NBs in Fe2+/H2O2 system. The final concentrations of Fe2+, TMB, and H2O2 were 50 μM, 0.4 mM, and 80 mM, respectively. The final reaction volume was set to 1 ml by adding ultra-pure/NBs water. After preparing the reaction mixtures, they were immediately transferred to a 96-well plate (each sample of 200 μL in 4 wells). A microplate reader (VERSA max microplate reader) was employed to monitor the optical density change at 652 nm.

The antioxidant effect of N2 NBs was determined by the ability to block the oxidization of ABTS (final concentration of 200 μg/mL) by the hydroxyl radicals that were generated from H2O2 (final concentration of 0.8 M) with the catalysis of Cu2+ (10 μM). The effect of N2 NBs on the oxidation kinetics of ABTS was determined by monitoring the absorbance at 405 nm. The final reaction volume was set to 1 ml by adding ultrapure/NBs water. After preparing the reaction mixtures, they were immediately transferred to a 96-well plate (each sample of 200 μL in 4 wells). A microplate reader (VERSA max microplate reader) was employed to monitor the optical density change at 405 nm.

Under alkaline conditions, pyrogallol can rapidly auto-oxidize to release O2−·, and generate a colored intermediate product which that has a strong light absorption at the wavelength of 325 nm. When there is a substance capable of quenching O2−·, the accumulation of the intermediate products would be prevented. The final concentration of pyrogallol was 0.1 mM, and the buffer system was a Tris–HCl buffer solution with pH 8.0. After preparing the reaction mixtures, they were immediately transferred to a 96-well plate (each sample of 200 μL in 4 wells). A microplate reader (VERSA max microplate reader) was employed to monitor the optical density change at 325 nm.

The liquid sample was sucked into the capillary tube and sealed for ESR measurement. The measurement parameters are as follows: Centra field: 324 mT; Sweep width: 5.0 × 1 mT; Mod.freq.: 100.00 kHz; Mod. width + /−: 0.35 × 1 mT; Sweep time: 1 min. ESR Data Process software was used to analyze data.

The reaction solution (2 ml) containing TMB (0.4 mM) and H2O2 (0.08 M) in a quartz cuvette (1 × 1 × 5 cm3) was placed 30 cm away from a UV lamp (20 W) and was irradiated at a wavelength of 256 nm for 10 min. The solution's absorbance value at a wavelength of 652 nm was measured at the end of the radiation.

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Di Meo, S., Reed, T. T., Venditti, P. & Victor, V. M. Role of ROS and RNS sources in physiological and pathological conditions. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longevity 2016, 1245049 (2016).

Google Scholar

Zarkovic, N. Roles and functions of ROS and RNS in cellular physiology and pathology. Cells 9, 767 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Luo, J., Mills, K., le Cessie, S., Noordam, R. & van Heemst, D. Ageing, age-related diseases and oxidative stress: What to do next?. Ageing Res. Rev. 57, 100982 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Sharma, A., Gupta, P. & Prabhakar, P. K. Endogenous repair system of oxidative damage of DNA. Curr. Chem. Biol. 13, 110–119 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Saccà, S. C., Cutolo, C. A., Ferrari, D., Corazza, P. & Traverso, C. E. The eye, oxidative damage and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Nutrients 10, 668 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Jakubczyk, K. et al. Reactive oxygen species—Sources, functions, oxidative damage. Pol. Merkuriusz Lek. 48, 124–127 (2020).

Google Scholar

Lobo, V., Patil, A., Phatak, A. & Chandra, N. Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: Impact on human health. Pharmacogn. Rev. 4, 118 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Dennis, J. M. & Witting, P. K. Protective role for antioxidants in acute kidney disease. Nutrients 9, 718 (2017).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Waring, W. Uric acid: An important antioxidant in acute ischaemic stroke. QJM 95, 691–693 (2002).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Saso, L. & Firuzi, O. Pharmacological applications of antioxidants: Lights and shadows. Curr. Drug Targets 15, 1177–1199 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Branen, A. Toxicology and biochemistry of butylated hydroxyanisole and butylated hydroxytoluene. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 52, 59–63 (1975).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kuller, L. H. A time to stop prescribing antioxidant vitamins to prevent and treat heart disease?. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 21, 1253 (2001).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Brown, B. G., Cheung, M. C., Lee, A. C., Zhao, X.-Q. & Chait, A. Antioxidant vitamins and lipid therapy: End of a long romance?. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 22, 1535–1546 (2002).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Jaouad, B. & Torsten, B. Exogenous antioxidants—Double-edged swords in cellular redox state: Health beneficial effects at physiologic doses versus deleterious effects at high doses. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longevity 3, 28–37 (2010).

Google Scholar

Cort, W. M. et al. Antioxidant activity and stability of 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 52, 174–178 (1975).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Nagy, M. E. Evaluation of the Stability of Microencapsulated Lycopene Isomers (Rutgers The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick, 2009).

Google Scholar

Shi, J. & Maguer, M. L. Lycopene in tomatoes: Chemical and physical properties affected by food processing. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 40, 1–42 (2000).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Baschieri, A. et al. Enhanced antioxidant activity under biomimetic settings of ascorbic acid included in halloysite nanotubes. Antioxidants 8, 30 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Gallarate, M., Carlotti, M. E., Trotta, M. & Bovo, S. On the stability of ascorbic acid in emulsified systems for topical and cosmetic use. Int. J. Pharm. 188, 233–241 (1999).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Yuan, J.-P. & Chen, F. Degradation of ascorbic acid in aqueous solution. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46, 5078–5082 (1998).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Margolis, S. A. & Duewer, D. L. Measurement of ascorbic acid in human plasma and serum: Stability, intralaboratory repeatability, and interlaboratory reproducibility. Clin. Chem. 42, 1257–1262 (1996).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Roeselova, M., Vieceli, J., Dang, L. X., Garrett, B. C. & Tobias, D. J. Hydroxyl radical at the air-water interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 16308–16309 (2004).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Vácha, R., Slavíček, P., Mucha, M., Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. & Jungwirth, P. Adsorption of atmospherically relevant gases at the air/water interface: free energy profiles of aqueous solvation of N2, O2, O3, OH, H2O, HO2, and H2O2. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 11573–11579 (2004).

Article Google Scholar

Zhong, J. et al. Interaction of the NH2 radical with the surface of a water droplet. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 12070–12078 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Enami, S., Fujii, T., Sakamoto, Y., Hama, T. & Kajii, Y. Carboxylate ion availability at the air–water interface. J. Phys. Chem. A 120, 9224–9234 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Heath, A. A. & Valsaraj, K. T. Effects of temperature, oxygen level, ionic strength, and pH on the reaction of benzene with hydroxyl radicals at the air–water interface in comparison to the bulk aqueous phase. J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 8527–8536 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lee, J. K., Samanta, D., Nam, H. G. & Zare, R. N. Spontaneous formation of gold nanostructures in aqueous microdroplets. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–9 (2018).

ADS Google Scholar

Lee, J. K., Samanta, D., Nam, H. G. & Zare, R. N. Micrometer-sized water droplets induce spontaneous reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 10585–10589 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Gong, C. et al. Spontaneous reduction-i nduced degradation of viologen compounds in water microdroplets and its inhibition by host–guest complexation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 3510–3516 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Dyett, B. P. & Zhang, X. Accelerated formation of H2 nanobubbles from a surface nanodroplet reaction. ACS Nano 14, 10944–10953 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Li, Z., Zeng, H. & Zhang, X. Growth rates of hydrogen microbubbles in reacting femtoliter droplets. Langmuir 38, 6638–6646 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Alheshibri, M., Qian, J., Jehannin, M. & Craig, V. S. J. A history of nanobubbles. Langmuir 32, 11086–11100 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Zhou, L., Wang, S., Zhang, L. & Hu, J. Generation and stability of bulk nanobubbles: A review and perspective. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 53, 101439 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Tada, K. et al. ESR measurement of hydroxyl radicals in micro-nanobubble water. Chem. Lett. 43, 1907–1908 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Liu, S., Oshita, S., Thuyet, D. Q., Saito, M. & Yoshimoto, T. Antioxidant activity of hydrogen nanobubbles in water with different reactive oxygen species both in vivo and in vitro. Langmuir 34, 11878–11885 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Fan, W., Li, X., Wang, W.-X. & Liu, S. Enhanced removal of free radicals by aqueous hydrogen nanobubbles and their role in oxidative stress. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 15096–15107 (2022).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ke, S. et al. Formation and stability of bulk nanobubbles in different solutions. Langmuir 35, 5250–5256 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Olucha, F., Martínez-García, F. & López-García, C. A new stabilizing agent for the tetramethyl benzidine (TMB) reaction product in the histochemical detection of horseradish peroxidase (HRP). J. Neurosci. Methods 13, 131–138 (1985).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Sun, L. et al. Research progress on bulk nanobubbles. Particuology 60, 99–106 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Oh, S. H. & Kim, J.-M. Generation and stability of bulk nanobubbles. Langmuir 33, 3818–3823 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Jadhav, A. J. & Barigou, M. On the clustering of bulk nanobubbles and their colloidal stability. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 601, 816–824 (2021).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Zhang, M. & Seddon, J. R. T. Nanobubble–nanoparticle interactions in bulk solutions. Langmuir 32, 11280–11286 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kathmann, S. M., Kuo, I.-F.W. & Mundy, C. J. Electronic effects on the surface potential at the vapor−liquid interface of water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 16556–16561 (2008).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Vácha, R., Jungwirth, P., Chen, J. & Valsaraj, K. Adsorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at the air–water interface: Molecular dynamics simulations and experimental atmospheric observations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 4461–4467 (2006).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Masaki, H., Atsumi, T. & Sakurai, H. Detection of hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals in murine skin fibroblasts under UVB irradiation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 206, 474–479 (1995).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Benitez, F. J., Beltran-Heredia, J., Acero, J. L. & Rubio, F. J. Oxidation of several chlorophenolic derivatives by UV irradiation and hydroxyl radicals. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 76, 312–320 (2001).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Tang, P. & Sun, G. Generation of hydroxyl radicals and effective whitening of cotton fabrics by H2O2 under UVB irradiation. Carbohydr. Polym. 160, 153–162 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Fujita, T. et al. Free radical degradation in aqueous solution by blowing hydrogen and carbon dioxide nanobubbles. Sci. Rep. 11, 3068 (2021).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Xiao, L. & Miwa, N. Hydrogen nano-bubble water suppresses ROS generation, adipogenesis, and interleukin-6 secretion in hydrogen-peroxide- or PMA-stimulated adipocytes and three-dimensional subcutaneous adipose equivalents. Cells 10, 626 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Halliwell, B. Are polyphenols antioxidants or pro-oxidants? What do we learn from cell culture and in vivo studies?. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 476, 107–112 (2008).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Zhang, M., Men, Y., Zhu, Q. & Ying, W. Koisio technology-modulated cell culture media can significantly increase the antioxidant capacity of mouse fibroblasts. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.03.482792 (2022).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

We gratefully acknowledge Prof. Changqing Sun at Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, for the helpful discussion with him on the mechanism of nanobubble antioxidation. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11975297, 12274427, 11874379, 22109169, 12104469, 12005284), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (No. QYZDJ-SSW-SLH019), and Shanghai International Science & Technology Cooperation Program (22490714400).

These authors contributed equally: Jin Zheng and Juncheng Qi.

CAS Key Laboratory of Interfacial Physics and Technology, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201800, China

Jin Zheng, Juncheng Qi, Kaiwei Yuan, Lijuan Zhang, Hongwei Zhao, Junhong Lü, Beien Zhu, Yi Zhang & Jun Hu

Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201203, China

Lijuan Zhang, Hongwei Zhao, Junhong Lü, Beien Zhu, Yi Zhang & Jun Hu

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

Jin Zheng, Juncheng Qi & Kaiwei Yuan

Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China

Sanzhao Song

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Conceptualization: H.J., Z.Y. Methodology: Z.J., Q.J., S.S., Y.K. Investigation: Z.L., Z.H., L.J. Visualization: Z.Y., Z.J. Supervision: H.J., Z.Y., S.S., Z.B. Writing—original draft: Z.J., Q.J. Writing—review & editing: Z.Y., H.J.

Correspondence to Yi Zhang or Jun Hu.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Zheng, J., Qi, J., Song, S. et al. An antioxidation strategy based on ultra-small nanobubbles without exogenous antioxidants. Sci Rep 13, 8455 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35766-5

Download citation

Received: 06 March 2023

Accepted: 23 May 2023

Published: 25 May 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35766-5

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.